Monday 23 November 2015

Latest on the VW diesel emissions scandal: petrol cars and 3.0-litre diesels involved, details of recalls and compensation.

The Volkswagen Group is likely to have to recall a further 85,000 vehicles worldwide, as VW's US arm has admitted its 3.0-litre TDI V6 engines found in cars built from 2009 to 2016 also contain software programmes that were initially hidden from the government testers. The firm has admitted that the Volkswagen Group’s 3.0-litre diesel engines, fitted in premium cars like the Audi A6, A7, A8 and SUVs like the Q5, Q7, Porsche Cayenne and VW’s Touareg, come with an auxiliary emissions control device that improves emissions figures in official tests. An Audi spokesman has since confirmed the auxiliary device does not violate European law, but should have been disclosed to US authorities.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) previously stated the Group’s 3.0-litre TDI engines also contained the 'defeat device' that sparked the VW emissions scandal, but VW quickly denied these claims. The VW Group has now moved to underline the difference between the auxiliary control device in the 3.0 TDI cars, and the defeat device found in the EA 189 engines. The former is used to heat up the pollution-control catalyst faster than normal so it operates more effectively. Audi spokesman Brad Stertz said: "We are willing to take another crack at reprogramming to a degree that the regulators deem acceptable." Stertz also said the cost of tweaking the software is in the "double digits millions of Euros." Volkswagen bosses may face prison time, according to Transport Secretary Bosses from the VW Group in the UK could face up to 10 years in prison if prosecuted for their role in the diesel emissions scandal, according to Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin.

In a letter to the Transport Select Committee, McLoughlin said there are several legal routes available including prosecution for falsely supplying information for type approval, misleading actions and omissions and fraud. The most serious of these would mean prosecution by the Serious Fraud Office for false representation under the 2006 Fraud Act which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. McLoughlin confirmed an investigation is underway and further announcements would be made once the evidence had been assessed. At the same time, VW Group has announced it's cutting €1billion from its "investment activities", lowering its spend from €13bn a year to €12bn. A new design centre in Wolfsburg and paintshop in Mexico have been put on hold, as well as the successor to the Phaeton luxury saloon, which was intended to be an all-electric model. Some €100 million of the savings from projects will be ploughed into alternative drivetrain research next year, including the development of electric systems. False mpg and CO2 figures on 800,000 cars Over half of the 800,000 cars found with false mpg and CO2 figures have been identified as 2016 models by VW’s own internal investigation.

The 430,000 vehicles include models from Audi, SEAT, Skoda and Volkswagen, and the Group has released a list (pdf link) detailing all of the models affected. This was the first time VW admitted its Euro 6 compliant engines have been manipulated, and the first time the Group’s frugal 3-cylinder petrol and diesel engines are drawn into the scandal. From the list it is also evident that Group cars with TSI or TFSI petrol, or TDI diesel engines with 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0-litre capacities are involved – widening the scandal further. The Group has confirmed it is working with the German Federal Vehicle and Transport Authority (KBA) on the solution, and owners will be able to check whether their vehicle is one of the ones involved through online portals. Volkswagen has also admitted it is in talks with financial and fiscal authorities of several countries so that “all taxes arising in direct relation to the CO2 issue are charged straight to the Volkswagen Group and not to the customers.” VW emissions cheat software may not be illegal in EU tests While VW has admitted to tampering CO2 and fuel economy figures on 800,000 cars, it looks as if the Group has not actually broken European emissions law.

A loophole in EU emissions regulation looks to have allowed VW to build cars with the software device, as minutes from the 2012 meeting of the EU type approval authorities state: “The legislation does not clearly state the criteria by which the Type Approval authority may judge the validity of engine settings ‘prescribed by the manufacturer’ for the Type I test and there is a concern that, to give good emissions/fuel consumption results, a manufacturer could specify a special setting that is not normally used for everyday driving.” A letter from VW UK’s boss, Paul Willis, to the House of Commons Transport Committee confirmed the KBA does not see the tech as cheating on EU tests. He said: “I would now like to share with you that we have just recieved confirmation that the KBA does not regard the use of this technology in the EU as problematic and thus as being in line with current legislation.” The Volkswagen emissions scandal first broke out in September 18 2015 with the revelations that VW had fitted a ‘defeat device’ to its EA 189 engine models to cheat US emissions tests.

Since then, a chain reaction has rocked the VW Group and the wider industry to its core, as 11million VW Group vehicles with 1.2, 1.6, and 2.0-litre EA 189 diesel engines were confirmed to contain the rogue software. Over 1.1million vehicles are affected in the UK alone. The VW Group has set aside £4.7billion to cover the damaging effects of the emissions scandal but it may face a further £2billion in costs after an internal investigation found that mpg fuel economy and CO2 emissions ratings for 800,000 other vehicles were also manipulated by engineers. This subsequent discovery implicated Volkswagen Group petrol-engined cars in the scandal for the first time, originally the 1.4-litre engine with 'cylinder-on-demand' technology but now a range of petrol and diesel units. VW is facing legal allegations from a number of sources and has said it will pay for any extra taxes faced by owners who find their car's emissions levels being officially reclassified. Owners of affected VW vehicles in the US are set to receive $1,000 (£662) as an initial form of compensation, but UK and EU owners are unlikely to receive anything, as the Group has confirmed it did not cheat in EU testing.

VW 'loyalty bonus' offered to stop sales slide:
 Volkswagen's UK car sales were down 9.84 per cent in October compared to the same period last year - suggesting that customers are losing faith in the brand following the emissions scandal. Sales of sister brands Skoda and SEAT are also down - and the VW Group is reportedly attributing the fall to the damaging events of recent weeks. Audi sales appear to be unaffected but some brands unconnected to the VW emissions scandal including Ford and Vauxhall have also suffered sales dips. This is potentially a result of uncertainty among consumers in the wake of the emissions scandal revelations. To boost sales, Volkswagen UK will offer 'loyalty bonus' discounts to existing owners or their family members registered at the same address buying a new VW. Cash incentives range from £400 off a new up! to £1,500 off the Sharan or Touareg, over and above other incentives, a spokesman has confirmed. Are other engines affected? The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its European counterparts have questioned the legality of further engines in the VW line-up, suggesting 3.0-litre TDI engines, and models fitted with EA 288 engines were also built with the defeat device on board. Volkswagen and the German KBA authority have denied the allegations surrounding the EA 288 engines, stating that no malevolent software is or has been present. But the Group has admitted its 3.0-litre TDI V6 units found in model years 2009 through 2016 do come with an auxiliary control device that should have been cleared with US authorities. VW’s new Euro 6 engines have also been confirmed not to contain the defeat device, and remain legal under European law. Although, as reported above, there are issues with the mpg and CO2 ratings on these cars.  

Three-point plan to recall UK's dieselgate cars.
In the UK, the VW Group is looking to implement a three-stage plan to recall and repair all 1.2 million vehicles affected by the end of 2016. The Group is currently working with the German Motor Industry Federation (KBA) to approve a permanent fix to the emissions crisis - with the first round of recalls expected to start in early 2016. VW's UK boss Paul Willis has confirmed the 1.2-litre and 2.0-litre diesel engines will require a software fix, while vehicles with a 1.6-litre diesel will also need new injectors fitted. This means around 400,000 UK cars would require mechanical changes. Speaking before the House of Commons' select committee, Willis failed to answer questions relating to whether or not UK owners would be compensated but transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin has since urged VW to consider compensation for affected motorists who face falling residual values on their cars. While UK vehicles may get by with software tweaks and injector swaps, vehicles in US and will likely need physical changes to the catalytic converters and the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) AdBlue urea injection systems to pass the strict North American emissions criteria.

• Exclusive: car makers 'can't meet' Euro6 emissions targets VW Group recall:
Numbers of UK cars affected The VW Group has said that the following quantities of UK vehicles are set for a recall:
• VW passenger cars - 508,276
• Audi - 393,450 • SEAT - 76,773
 • Skoda - 131,569
• VW commercial vehicles - 79,838

Source: Auto Express

Tuesday 30 July 2013

The Audi RS6 Avant vs Mercedes E63 AMG


The Audi RS6 and Mercedes E63 AMG take the mega-estate to a whole new level. But which of these powerhouses is the better buy?

High-performance estates are nothing new, but the latest crop are the most extreme ever. With their supercar-rivalling muscle and family-friendly practicality, these versatile cars are as at home on the school run as they are on the Santa Pod drag strip.Leading the charge of new models is the Audi RS6 Avant, which features a thumping twin-turbo V8, four-wheel drive and, as with the standard A6, a roomy, upmarket cabin. And while the new 4.0-litre engine is smaller and slightly less powerful than the V10 used in the old car, the latest RS6 promises to be the fastest and most efficient version ever.

Lining up against the rapid Avant is the new Mercedes E63 AMG estate. As with the other models in the E-Class range, the AMG has recently benefited from a facelift, which extends to revised looks and a subtly upgraded cabin. Elsewhere the car is largely unchanged, which means you get a muscular twin-turbocharged 5.5-litre V8, traditional rear-wheel-drive handling and one of the biggest boots in the business.

Verdict

Both of our contenders here deliver the same blend of family-friendly practicality and supercar-humbling performance. But which is better?Well, the Audi claims the honours for outright pace. Its remarkable twin-turbo 4.0-litre V8 is explosive, while its quattro all-wheel-drive transmission allows you to access the car’s full potential in all weathers. The pumped-up RS6 also looks great, and the cabin serves up a masterclass in style and build quality.Yet there’s something missing... Yes, the RS6 is eye-poppingly fast, but it lacks the involvement we expect from the best high-performance machines. The major controls are a little numb and the engine note is muffled.

By contrast, the Mercedes starts delivering thrills the moment you turn the key. It’s not as eye-catching as its competitor here and its interior looks dated, but the E63’s bellowing V8 and engaging rear-wheel-drive handling make it huge fun to drive.The AMG is hardly a one-trick pony. Its vast boot and roomy cabin make it the more versatile of our duo, plus it undercuts the Audi by around £1,500. And those with deep pockets can upgrade to the S that matches the RS6 if they want scorching straight-line pace.

If you’re after a fast and fun estate to carry a family of five, look no further than the E63 AMG. MG

Source: AutoExpress

Thursday 11 July 2013

Maserati Gran Turismo

It is always nice to see where your money is spent. At Maserati things are obviously taken seriously.

Here is a picture of 4 Maserati Gran Turismo getting delivered at Benfield Maserati in Newcastle.

I find remarkable the full car cover to protect these masterpieces of Italian craftsmanship but moreover it's amazing that they arrive in an Italian plated transporter truck!

This picture commends a lot of respect to an exclusive brand like the "Tridente", the most popular Italian way to address a Maserati.  MG

Wednesday 10 July 2013

2014 Skoda Yeti Prototype

The Skoda Yeti is due to be updated for 2014, and these first spy pictures reveal it'll get a sleeker look inspired by the latest Octavia and Rapid models.

Camouflaged to look like the current car, this test mule was spotted in the Czech Republic near the manufacturer's base. We're expecting the Yeti to ditch its centrally mounted rounded lights, in favour of a less controversial design. The grille will be narrower, the bonnet more sculpted and the headlights a little more stylish. 

The daytime running lights used to be mounted in the two central headlamps but we're expecting them to move in to the headlights, with top-spec models getting a stylish new LED signature.

The rear of the new Yeti will also see big changes with a modified bumper, newly shaped numberplate holder and LED tail-lights.

The interior is likely to see improvements, too, but the engine line-up is expected to be carried over, although a stop/start system is a possibility to help reduce emissions.

The public unveiling of the Yeti is scheduled for the Frankfurt Motor Show in September, with sales expected to follow later in the year. MG

Source: AutoExpress

Wednesday 26 June 2013

2014 BMW 4 Series Convertible Revealed

Now that the BMW4 Series coupe has been officially revealed, the German automaker has little reason to hide its convertible variant behind heavy camouflage.

Clearly in the final stages of testing, we can see the 4 Series convertible with very little covering its shell. Having seen the 4 Series coupe in all its glory, the convertible will offer very little surprises once it makes its official production debut.

The 4 Series convertible will use a hard top rather than a soft cloth top, following in the traditional footsteps of its 3 Series convertible predecessor. Powerplants lurking under the hood should be identical to the 4 Series coupe. MG

Source: AutoGuide

Tuesday 11 June 2013

ROAD TEST: Alpina B6 Bi-Turbo.

Alpina has been building fettled BMWs for more than 40 years, and the B6 Bi-Turbo is its attempt at an M6 rival.

The car shares its 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8 with the top-spec 6 Series, but has 532bhp and 730Nm – that’s 20bhp less power but 50Nm more torque.

This is all fed to the rear wheels to give 0-62mph in 4.3 seconds – a tenth down on the M6 – and a near-200mph top speed. The rush of in-gear acceleration is staggering, while a clever fuel shut-off system ensures each upshift is followed by a rumbling exhaust burble.

Bespoke springs and tuned damper settings broaden the scope of the standard 6’s dynamic ability. In Comfort mode the ride is more supple, but in Sport and Sport+ it feels even firmer and more focused. A 55kg lighter kerbweight adds an extra layer of agility to the B6’s fantastic all-round abilities.

When cruising, this car is a seriously accomplished GT; there’s space for four (just) and a generous 460-litre luggage area. The interior is hushed and rough motorway surfaces are serenely smoothed out.

Luxurious touches such as the dark purple dials and hand-stitched leather seats add a real sense of occasion inside. The best news, though, is that the B6 starts from £970 less than the BMW M6, at £92,850.

Stacking the cards even further in the Alpina’s favour is the fact that it’s more economical than its counterpart. The lower kerbweight and eight-speed auto box – the M6 has seven gears – allow for 30.1mpg. The 6 Series manages only 28.5mpg.Admittedly, you’ll have to do without the ‘M’ badge, but if you’re considering buying an M6, the Alpina is good enough to make you think twice.

VERDICT: Alpina may be a niche brand, but the B6 Bi-Turbo is by far the best 6 Series we’ve driven. Faster and more characterful than the M6, yet cheaper and more efficient, it strikes a fine balance between long-distance ability and sharp handling. As with the BMW, it comes as a coupe or drop-top, and it feels even more special inside. It’s the one we’d recommend. MG

Source: AutoExpress

Monday 10 June 2013

FIRST DRIVE: Volkswagen Golf GTD

The Golf GTI's oil burning alter ego is back, and in Mk7 guise, the latest GTD is faster and more frugal than ever. But is this a case of always fun until someone loses an i?

What a difference a D makes. Not much of a difference at all, judging by the picture.

Visually, besides the badges, only different wheels and a chrome, rather than red strip, underscoring the grille, differentiate the GTD from the GTI. Inside, again, they’re almost identical, but the GTD’s sports seats are trimmed in a plainer tartan that does without the GTI’s Yuppie red infusion.

How do they compare for power and performance?

The petrol GTI’s 2.0-litre turbo four kicks out 217bhp and 258lb ft of torque, sufficient for 0-62mph in 6.5sec and a 152mph top end. Go for the optional performance pack (10bhp extra, torque stays the same) and you shave off 0.1 sec and add 3mph to the top speed.The diesel produces 184bhp (with no upgrade pack available, at least officially), but compensates with 280lb ft, so while its 142mph top speed and 7.5sec 62mph best won’t win any awards, it feels mightily rapid in the mid-range. It’s incredibly refined compared with earlier high power diesel Golfs, and even sounds like a proper hot hatch if you select the Sport button to engage some fake engine warblings. Predictably though, that typically narrow diesel powerband, where push runs out not long after 4000rpm, means the GTI impression isn’t entirely convincing. The GTD’s performance is useful, but never as invigorating as a GTI’s.The diesel engine adds 27kg to the kerbweight, almost all of it over the nose, but the handling remains excellent, provided you’re not expecting Megane Renaultsport tactility. The quick two-turns rack makes the GTD feel much more alert than its predecessor and you get the XDS+ system from the GTI, which pinches the inside front wheel to prevent wheelspin, and the inside rear to swivel the car into corners. Unfortunately, because you can’t get a Performance Pack upgrade, you can’t get the GTI’s optional mechanical limited slip differential, which actually pulls the car into the apex, the harder you plant your right foot. You won’t miss it if you spend your days shuttling between services on the M1, but you will if you also dabble in the odd trackday.

So which does VW expect to be more popular, the GTD or the GTi?

It’s no contest. This sector is massively dependent on fleet sales, and the CO2 and economy advantage of the diesel means it will outsell the petrol by two to one. Cleanest of the lot is the six-speed manual GTD at a staggering 67mpg and 109g/km, figures VW happily points out, match those of the 2007 104bhp Bluemotion Golf. A stick-shift GTI – no eco disaster itself - lags behind on 139g/km and 47mpg. Both cars are fractionally dirtier if you go for the optional DSG dual-clutch ‘box. We drove the GTD in both forms and preferred the light-shifting, more involving manual. In terms of list price, there’s almost nothing in it. A basic three-door GTD costs £25,285, and the equivalent GTi, £25,845.

Verdict

You'll have more fun in a GTI, thanks to the petrol engine’s character, and especially if you order the optional performance pack sadly not available on the GTD. But in 90% of driving situations the GTD is just as accomplished, looks just as good and will guzzle half as much fuel. And if you’re a company driver, it’s GTD all the way. Criticise the Golf for its predictability if you will, but the GTD is a fine car, and no hot hatch on the market is better in tune with the times. MG

Source: CAR Magazine